Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Please be aware of our policy on WP:3RR, which you are close to breaking on Jan Veizer. Please try to gain consensus on the talk-page first - before reverting again. Science is indeed not a popularity contest - but it is one based on the merit of hypotheses, and if most scientists disagree, then there is a high likelihood (but not certainty) that the hypothesis is wrong. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of the policy, thank you. That is why I only revert once per day. Isn't that what is encouraged? I totally disagree with you on the other thing though. Agreement with a hypothesis is a matter of opinion and has no place in an objective report like in an encyclopedia. You are trying to be objective, right? Then we should stick to the facts. The fact is that there are those who disagree and that disagreement is reported. How many people disagree is a matter of opinion. Unless you have an exact census. --Surgical Stryke (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
